Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Glass ceramic - MAGNA Glaskeramik GmbH - MAGNA glass ceramic (2022) (en) en de

A more recent version of this data set exists in the database.

Most recent version of this data set:00.00.022

Key Data Set Information
Location DE
Geographical representativeness description Dieser Datensatz repräsentiert die Situation des Unternehmens MAGNA Glaskeramik GmbH in 06179 Teutschenthal, im Hinblick auf die wichtigsten Technologien und die gesetzlichen Rahmenbedingungen.
Reference year 2020
Name
Glass ceramic - MAGNA Glaskeramik GmbH - MAGNA glass ceramic (2022)
Use advice for data set Dieser Datensatz beinhaltet die Ergebnisse für die Module A1-A3 sowie die Module, A5, C1, C2, C3, C4, D gemäß EN 15804. Ein Vergleich mit anderen Produkten ist nur mit einer vergleichbaren Anwendung im Gebäude zulässig. Grundsätzlich ist eine Gegenüberstellung oder die Bewertung von EPD Daten nur möglich, wenn alle zu vergleichenden Datensätze nach EN 15804 erstellt wurden und der Gebäudekontext, bzw. die produktspezifischen Leistungsmerkmale berücksichtigt werden.
Technical purpose of product or process Glass ceramics are used for outdoor applications as façades, gravestones and sculptures and for indoor applications as indoor walls, washbasins, showers, furniture, floors, kitchen worktops, bars, countertops, lifts, steps and as design objects.
Classification number 7.2.02
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • OEKOBAU.DAT: 7.2.02 Components for windows and curtain walls / Infill / Opaque fillings
General comment on data set Dieser Datensatz beinhaltet die Ergebnisse für die Module A1-A3 sowie Module A5, C1, C2, C3, C4, D. Das Umweltprofil beinhaltet die Aufwendungen für die Lebenszyklus-Stadien cradle to gate - with options (Modul A1-A3 + C + D und ein oder mehrere zusätzliche Module aus A4 bis B7). Die Herstellung der Verpackung wurde innerhalb der Module A1-A3 berücksichtigt.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Material properties of the reference flow
    • layer thickness: 0.023 m
    • grammage: 52.3 kg/m^2
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.07 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2027
Time representativeness description jährlicher Durchschnitt
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system The LCA results cover the life cycle stages of the manufacture of intermediate products up to raw material extraction and processing operations of secondary materials serving as input (e.g. recycling processes), their transports to the plant as well as the production itself, including the provision of all auxiliary and operating materials, energy, and the complete waste treatment or landfilling of residual waste during the stage of production. Modules A1, A2, and A3 are shown here as one aggregated module A1-A3. If further modules were calculated for this data set, they can be found separately and can be combined for a consideration of the entire life cycle.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0.12
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0.22
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 5.41E-7
  • 2.49E-12
  • 0
  • 5.72E-11
  • 2.5E-10
  • 1.11E-9
  • -1.09E-10
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 15.69
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.15
  • 0.000164
  • 0
  • ND
  • 0.000421
  • 0.00259
  • -0.000105
Output
  • 0.6
  • 0.00104
  • 0
  • 0.000221
  • 0.000669
  • 52.3
  • -0.000225
Input
  • 433
  • 0.0136
  • 0
  • 1.37
  • 0.94
  • 10.5
  • -0.48
Input
  • 0.25
  • -0.25
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.0383
  • 7.19E-7
  • 0
  • 0.00000131
  • 0.00014
  • 0.00011
  • -0.0000345
Input
  • 1.4E+3
  • 0.00262
  • 0
  • 0.0794
  • 0.43
  • 1.41
  • -0.11
Input
  • 0.32
  • -0.32
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 52.3
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 433
  • 0.0136
  • 0
  • 1.37
  • 0.94
  • 10.5
  • -0.48
Input
  • 1.4E+3
  • 0.00262
  • 0
  • 0.0794
  • 0.43
  • 1.41
  • -0.11

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
  • 32.9
  • 0.0659
  • 0
  • 0.104
  • 0.0535
  • 0.77
  • -0.028
  • 0.41
  • 0.0276
  • 0
  • 0.0000513
  • 0.000451
  • -0.023
  • -0.000138
  • 32.4
  • 0.0383
  • 0
  • 0.103
  • 0.053
  • 0.791
  • -0.0279
  • 0.0988
  • 6.87E-7
  • 0
  • 0.000663
  • 0.0000755
  • 0.00232
  • -0.0000191
  • 1.5E-11
  • 8.28E-18
  • 0
  • 2.64E-17
  • 1.27E-15
  • 3.07E-15
  • -3.14E-16
  • 0.0439
  • 0.00000993
  • 0
  • 0.000079
  • 0.000071
  • 0.00443
  • -0.0000289
  • 0.0573
  • 0.0000116
  • 0
  • 0.0000918
  • 0.00011
  • 0.00563
  • -0.0000361
  • 0.17
  • 0.0000533
  • 0
  • 0.000352
  • 0.000275
  • 0.0161
  • -0.00011
  • 0.000159
  • 1.36E-9
  • 0
  • 2.12E-7
  • 1.43E-7
  • 0.00000133
  • -3.61E-8
  • 0.0166
  • 0.00000365
  • 0
  • 0.0000293
  • 0.0000262
  • 0.00146
  • -0.0000103
  • 1.46
  • 0.00697
  • 0
  • 0.000401
  • 0.00841
  • 0.0849
  • -0.00208
  • 433
  • 0.0136
  • 0
  • 8.98E-9
  • 0.94
  • 7.46E-8
  • -0.48
  • 0.000128
  • 1.26E-10
  • 0
  • 1.37
  • 1.56E-8
  • 10.5
  • -4.59E-9

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND